Skip to main content

Patents & Intellectual Property Rights

Use patents and other intellectual property rights to legally fence competitors and slow their technological progress.

"Preventing competitors from developing a space including ring fencing a competitor."

  • Simon Wardley

🤔 Explanation​

What are Patents & Intellectual Property Rights?​

Patents & Intellectual Property Rights (IPR) involve securing legal exclusivity over innovations to prevent or deter competitors from evolving similar capabilities without authorization.

Innovations may include:

  • patents
  • copyrights
  • trademarks

Why use Patents & IPR?​

Employing IPR can:

  • Create legal barriers that delay or block competitor entry.
  • Generate licensing revenue while controlling technology evolution.
  • Encourage internal innovation by safeguarding R&D investments.

How to use Patents & IPR?​

  1. Conduct a patent landscape analysis to identify space and gaps.
  2. File broad and strategic patents covering key inventions and derivatives.
  3. Build a patent portfolio (thicket) around critical technologies.
  4. Enforce rights through licensing, litigation, or the threat thereof.
  5. Continuously monitor competitor filings and update your portfolio.

Core Principles​

  • Breadth: Cover core innovations and plausible alternatives to deter design-arounds.
  • Proactivity: File early to stake claims before the market matures.
  • Enforcement: Be prepared to litigate or negotiate to uphold your rights.

🗺️ Real-World Examples​

Pharmaceutical Patent Thickets​

Drug companies patent not only active compounds but also manufacturing processes, formulations, and secondary uses, creating a dense IP landscape that keeps generics at bay until patent expiration.

Qualcomm Cellular Technology Patents​

Qualcomm’s extensive portfolio in 3G/4G standards forces device manufacturers to license or risk litigation, effectively controlling evolution and capturing royalties.

Hypothetical Drone Delivery Patent​

A startup patents a broad drone delivery mechanism covering general package drop-off techniques. Established logistics firms must negotiate licenses or delay their own R&D to avoid infringement.

🚦 When to Use / When to Avoid​

🚦 Patents & IPR Strategy Self-Assessment Tool

Find out the strategic fit and organisational readiness by marking each statement as Yes/Maybe/No based on your context. Strategy Assessment Guide.

Landscape and Climate

How well does the strategy fit your context?

  • We have identified a critical technology with high future impact.
  • Our map shows competitors relying on unprotected alternatives.

Organisational Readiness (Doctrine)

How capable is your organisation to execute the strategy?

  • We have resources to manage filings, portfolios, and enforcement.
  • We can sustain potential litigation or licensing negotiations.

Assessment and Recommendation

Strategic Fit: Weak. Ability to Execute: Weak.

RECOMMENDATION
Consider alternative strategies or address significant gaps before proceeding.

LowHighStrategic FitHighLowAbility to Execute

Use when: You possess novel, patentable innovations in a sector where legal protection is recognized and enforceable.

Avoid when: The innovation cycle is too rapid for patents to be practical, enforcement costs outweigh benefits, or reputational risks are high.

🎯 Leadership​

Core challenge​

Balancing the strategic use of IPR to slow competitors with maintaining a positive ecosystem and avoiding costly legal battles.

Key leadership skills required​

  • Legal and regulatory acumen
  • Strategic portfolio management
  • Negotiation and conflict resolution
  • R&D coordination and foresight

Ethical considerations​

Consider the broader impact on innovation: overly broad or aggressive patents can stifle ecosystem growth and invite backlash from communities and regulators.

📋 How to Execute​

  1. Align R&D with strategic patent objectives.
  2. Engage patent counsel early for drafting and filing.
  3. Develop a monitoring process for competitor IP and potential infringements.
  4. Create licensing and enforcement policies.
  5. Review and prune the portfolio to focus on high-value assets.

📈 Measuring Success​

  • Number of patents filed and granted in strategic areas.
  • Licensing revenue generated or litigation outcomes.
  • Delay in competitor product launches due to IP barriers.
  • R&D investment returns protected by IPR.
  • Industry recognition and partnerships secured via IP leverage.

⚠️ Common Pitfalls and Warning Signs​

False Security​

A large portfolio does not guarantee market control; competitors may invent around your patents.

Costly Litigation​

Enforcement can be expensive and time-consuming, diverting focus from innovation.

Patent Thickets Harm Ecosystems​

Dense IP landscapes may deter not only competitors but also potential partners and complementary innovators.

🧠 Strategic Insights​

Balance Protection and Collaboration​

Combine selective openness (e.g., cross-licensing) with proprietary claims to foster ecosystem growth while safeguarding core assets.

Use IPR as Leverage​

Leverage patents for partnerships, mergers, or royalty streams, not just as defensive tools.

The Defensive Patent Aggregation Shield​

Many organizations acquire patents not for offensive litigation, but as a defensive shield. This strategy, often employed by large tech companies, involves building a substantial patent portfolio to deter lawsuits from competitors. The principle is akin to "mutually assured destruction" – if a competitor sues, the organization can countersue with its own patent arsenal. While this can reduce litigation risk, it also contributes to patent thickets, potentially stifling innovation for smaller entities that cannot afford such extensive portfolios. This approach also requires significant investment in acquiring and maintaining patents that may never be directly monetized through licensing, representing a strategic cost center aimed at preserving operational freedom.

The rise of open source software and collaborative innovation models presents a complex challenge and opportunity for IPR strategy. While seemingly contradictory, patents can coexist with open approaches. For instance, companies might patent certain technologies while contributing others to open source projects. This can be a strategic move to guide the direction of an ecosystem, ensure compatibility, or protect core business models that build upon open foundations. Furthermore, defensive patent pledges (where companies commit not to sue open source projects using their patents) are becoming more common, indicating a shift towards using IPR to foster, rather than hinder, collaborative innovation. The key is to strategically delineate what is protected, what is shared, and how IPR can support the overall ecosystem health while preserving competitive advantage.

IPR as a Geopolitical Lever​

Intellectual Property Rights are increasingly becoming a significant element in geopolitical strategy. Nations may incentivize domestic patent filings in strategic industries (e.g., AI, biotech, telecommunications) to bolster national competitiveness and technological sovereignty. Control over essential patents in global standards can translate into significant economic and political leverage. This can lead to "patent wars" not just between companies, but also between nations or economic blocs, with IPR being used as a tool in trade negotiations, for imposing sanctions, or for protecting national security interests. Businesses operating globally must be acutely aware of this geopolitical dimension, as IPR landscapes can shift based on international relations and national industrial policies, impacting market access and operational freedom.

❓ Key Questions to Ask​

  • Patentability: Is the innovation novel and non-obvious?
  • Coverage: Does the scope of our patents deter design-arounds?
  • Enforcement: Are we prepared for potential litigation costs?
  • Reputation: Could aggressive IP strategies harm brand or partnerships?
  • Alternatives: Are there open or collaborative approaches that align better with our goals?

🔀 Related Strategies​

⛅ Relevant Climatic Patterns​

📚 Further Reading & References​

Author

Dave Hulbert
Dave Hulbert
Builder and maintainer of Wardley Leadership Strategies