Poison
The Poison play is about strategic sabotage. If you can’t or don’t want to dominate a future space, you can still deny it to others.
Poison tactics shape perception, introduce friction, or distort incentives, making the space unattractive, unstable, or unviable. It’s a scorched earth approach—used to derail a competitor’s roadmap, destroy a nascent ecosystem, or stall innovation that threatens your position.
Poison isn’t about winning. It’s about ensuring no one else does.
Comparison of Poison Strategies
Strategy & Link | Primary Goal/Intent | Key Mechanisms | Typical Use Cases/Scenarios | Main Benefits (for the User of Poison) | Key Climatic Patterns |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
Designed to Fail | Ensure a competitor's project or initiative is unsuccessful by subtle sabotage. | Introducing flaws, withholding critical information/support, setting unrealistic expectations, mismanaging resources. | When directly opposing a project is not feasible; to undermine a competitor's new venture or product launch without overt aggression. | Competitor's initiative fails, resources wasted by competitor, maintains status quo or your relative advantage. | Competitors actions will change the game, Most competitors have poor situational awareness |
Insertion | Introduce elements into a competitor's system or ecosystem that cause harm or instability. | Planting misinformation, introducing incompatible components, fostering dissent in communities, exploiting vulnerabilities. | To disrupt competitor operations, discredit their offerings, or create internal conflict within their ecosystem. | Competitor instability, loss of trust in competitor's offerings, slowing competitor's progress. | Characteristics change (negatively for the target), Inertia can kill an organisation (if they can't adapt to the poison) |
Licensing | Use restrictive or complex licensing terms to hinder adoption or use by others. | Predatory licensing, complex legal terms, high fees for critical components, FUD around IPR. | To make a competitor's product unviable, to slow adoption of an open standard you wish to control or supersede. | Reduced competition, increased dependency on your alternatives, revenue generation through punitive licensing. | Capital flows to new areas of value (away from poisoned area), [IPR as a decelerator (implicit)] |
📄️ Designed to Fail
Intentionally launching flawed initiatives to occupy, fragment, or poison a market before it can pose a threat.
📄️ Insertion
Embedding agents or narratives to covertly steer competitors into suboptimal strategic decisions.
📄️ Licensing
Using legal terms to restrict competitors and lock in an ecosystem.